Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Super Mario Odyssey
Author Message
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #1
Super Mario Odyssey

Dicuss.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kcdRBHM7kM

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-16-2017 02:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #2
Super Mario Odyssey

Anyone at all?

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-17-2017 12:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #3
Super Mario Odyssey

Okay,really?

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-18-2017 12:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 68 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #4
Super Mario Odyssey

The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

well would you look at the time its time to gay
01-18-2017 03:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #5
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-18-2017 03:24 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

Your opinion?

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-18-2017 09:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jop Offline
Revolutionary

Posts: 443
Joined: Aug 2014
Thanks: 271
Given 159 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
Post: #6
Super Mario Odyssey

I'll probably buy it someday, when I have a Switch. Which is not anytime soon.
01-19-2017 04:02 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 68 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #7
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-18-2017 09:29 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 03:24 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

Your opinion?

Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonice Adventure, and maybe a little bit of the Super Show mixed in.

well would you look at the time its time to gay
01-19-2017 10:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #8
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-19-2017 10:29 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 09:29 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 03:24 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

Your opinion?

Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonic Adventure
SEGA doesn't own the concept of rolling or city levels.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-19-2017 01:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 68 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #9
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-19-2017 01:03 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 10:29 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 09:29 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 03:24 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

Your opinion?

Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonic Adventure
SEGA doesn't own the concept of rolling or city levels.

I know, I just thought it looked similar. Wasn't criticizing. The roll actually looks like the one from the Super Mario Super Show intro

well would you look at the time its time to gay
01-19-2017 03:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #10
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-19-2017 03:13 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 01:03 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 10:29 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 09:29 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 03:24 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  The last part: Super Mario Bros, the Minish Cap

Your opinion?

Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonic Adventure
SEGA doesn't own the concept of rolling or city levels.

I know, I just thought it looked similar. Wasn't criticizing. The roll actually looks like the one from the Super Mario Super Show intro
Or the one that was introduced in Super Mario 3D Land.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-20-2017 06:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 68 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #11
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-20-2017 06:19 AM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 03:13 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 01:03 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 10:29 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-18-2017 09:29 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  Your opinion?

Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonic Adventure
SEGA doesn't own the concept of rolling or city levels.

I know, I just thought it looked similar. Wasn't criticizing. The roll actually looks like the one from the Super Mario Super Show intro
Or the one that was introduced in Super Mario 3D Land.

True, though that could have been inspired by it too for all we know

well would you look at the time its time to gay
01-20-2017 09:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #12
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-20-2017 09:33 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-20-2017 06:19 AM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 03:13 PM)Geicosuave Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 01:03 PM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-19-2017 10:29 AM)Geicosuave Wrote:  Ah, yes. Sorry.
Anyway, I think it looks really good, though with a striking resemblance to Sonic Adventure
SEGA doesn't own the concept of rolling or city levels.

I know, I just thought it looked similar. Wasn't criticizing. The roll actually looks like the one from the Super Mario Super Show intro
Or the one that was introduced in Super Mario 3D Land.

True, though that could have been inspired by it too for all we know
Possibly.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-21-2017 09:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
thewake Offline
Unconstructive

Posts: 5,908
Joined: Jun 2007
Thanks: 76
Given 276 thank(s) in 195 post(s)
Post: #13
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

if the switch kills nintendo they'll deserve it

RIP IN PEACE LEONARD NIMOY
[Image: nAOqYk7.png]

[Image: USVWSwj.png]
01-21-2017 06:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #14
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-21-2017 06:27 PM)thewake Wrote:  if the switch kills nintendo



Cuckoo

What makes you think that could ever happen?

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-22-2017 01:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Jop
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #15
Super Mario Odyssey

WHERE DID EVERYBODY GO?

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-23-2017 04:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
thewake Offline
Unconstructive

Posts: 5,908
Joined: Jun 2007
Thanks: 76
Given 276 thank(s) in 195 post(s)
Post: #16
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-22-2017 01:19 AM)Superkamiguru Wrote:  
(01-21-2017 06:27 PM)thewake Wrote:  if the switch kills nintendo



Cuckoo

What makes you think that could ever happen?

Most likely it wouldn't kill them per se. But it could easily put them on track to another failed console. If this happens enough they could eventually back out of the home console market altogether, leaving themselves as just a handheld company or turning them into another Sega. I assume they have a lot of money stored up from the success of the Wii so they're probably comfy financially for now. But the Wii U was a failure and the Switch seems to be another gimmick. You can only ride on gimmicks for so long. Whatever happened to making a solid console? I guess Sony and Microsoft have basically driven them out of that market. Even though the Gamecube was amazing, had great Nintendo games, it was a relatively poor performer revenue-wise. They're trying to leverage their expertise in the handheld arena now and transfer it to the console realm, I guess. Maybe it will work? Maybe it won't. But if it doesn't they only have themselves to blame.

RIP IN PEACE LEONARD NIMOY
[Image: nAOqYk7.png]

[Image: USVWSwj.png]
01-23-2017 11:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jop Offline
Revolutionary

Posts: 443
Joined: Aug 2014
Thanks: 271
Given 159 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
Post: #17
Super Mario Odyssey

Oh yes, a portable console that you can connect to the TV. Totally a gimmick.

Everything that comes out of Nintendo will be called a gimmick. Motion controls, second screen, 3D, now this. THEY ARE NOT GIMMICKS.

Sony and Microsoft don't make TV consoles anymore at all. The PlayStation 4 and Xbox One are literally PC's in disguise. They have EXACTLY THE SAME INTERNAL COMPONENTS as a PC.

And people are falling for it en masse. The Wii U was the only real TV console left. And it had a controller that wasn't extremely cheaply made, and with a second screen in it. And it was hundreds of euro's cheaper than such a fake console (€100 less + no €60 per year online multiplayer subscription!).

That's how good at marketing Sony and Microsoft are. They can sell a PC as if it were a console and nobody outside of a few technologically inclined people notice. Don't be one of their tools.

I hope the Switch earns Nintendo enough money that they can afford to create a new TV console. Sigh.
01-26-2017 08:44 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #18
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-26-2017 08:44 AM)Jop Wrote:  Oh yes, a portable console that you can connect to the TV. Totally a gimmick.

Everything that comes out of Nintendo will be called a gimmick. Motion controls, second screen, 3D, now this. THEY ARE NOT GIMMICKS.

Sony and Microsoft don't make TV consoles anymore at all. The PlayStation 4 and Xbox One are literally PC's in disguise. They have EXACTLY THE SAME INTERNAL COMPONENTS as a PC.

And people are falling for it en masse. The Wii U was the only real TV console left. And it had a controller that wasn't extremely cheaply made, and with a second screen in it. And it was hundreds of euro's cheaper than such a fake console (€100 less + no €60 per year online multiplayer subscription!).

That's how good at marketing Sony and Microsoft are. They can sell a PC as if it were a console and nobody outside of a few technologically inclined people notice. Don't be one of their tools.

I hope the Switch earns Nintendo enough money that they can afford to create a new TV console. Sigh.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-26-2017 09:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 68 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #19
Super Mario Odyssey

In case some of you dont know, the switch will have a subscription for wifi

well would you look at the time its time to gay
01-26-2017 10:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jop Offline
Revolutionary

Posts: 443
Joined: Aug 2014
Thanks: 271
Given 159 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
Post: #20
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

I knew :-( Probably because
1. they saw Sony and Microsoft get away with it
2. they needed money to subsidize the hardware. Consoles (with the exception of the old Wii excluding development costs, and the new fake consoles by Sony and Microsoft of course) are always sold at a loss (the hardware is worth WAY more than what it's sold for) Normally, the 30% profit cut from games offsets this loss, but Nintendo has lost so much money from the Wii U that they can't afford it anymore. So they turn to a subscription...
01-26-2017 10:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
thewake Offline
Unconstructive

Posts: 5,908
Joined: Jun 2007
Thanks: 76
Given 276 thank(s) in 195 post(s)
Post: #21
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

(01-26-2017 08:44 AM)Jop Wrote:  Oh yes, a portable console that you can connect to the TV. Totally a gimmick.

Everything that comes out of Nintendo will be called a gimmick. Motion controls, second screen, 3D, now this. THEY ARE NOT GIMMICKS.

Sony and Microsoft don't make TV consoles anymore at all. The PlayStation 4 and Xbox One are literally PC's in disguise. They have EXACTLY THE SAME INTERNAL COMPONENTS as a PC.

And people are falling for it en masse. The Wii U was the only real TV console left. And it had a controller that wasn't extremely cheaply made, and with a second screen in it. And it was hundreds of euro's cheaper than such a fake console (€100 less + no €60 per year online multiplayer subscription!).

That's how good at marketing Sony and Microsoft are. They can sell a PC as if it were a console and nobody outside of a few technologically inclined people notice. Don't be one of their tools.

I hope the Switch earns Nintendo enough money that they can afford to create a new TV console. Sigh.

All consoles are computers. I dun geddit.

RIP IN PEACE LEONARD NIMOY
[Image: nAOqYk7.png]

[Image: USVWSwj.png]
01-27-2017 06:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jop Offline
Revolutionary

Posts: 443
Joined: Aug 2014
Thanks: 271
Given 159 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
Post: #22
RE: Super Mario Odyssey

A game console and a PC are different kinds of computers, though. They have distinct hardware.

The PlayStation 4 and Xbox One have nearly exactly the same internal hardware as a PC. They are fake consoles. The PlayStation 1, 2 and 3 were real and the Xbox 360 was real. But then came the huge scam.
And people fell for it.
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2017 07:10 PM by Jop.)
01-27-2017 07:05 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 79 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Post: #23
Super Mario Odyssey

Bumps are for cars.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

02-06-2017 01:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 332
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2765
Given 93 thank(s) in 84 post(s)
Post: #24
Super Mario Odyssey

I'm bringing it back.

their pee should hv been shot out like a ki blast breaking the rocks

oh and also No one has any rights. We're free, rights create invisible restrictions. But we live in a society where the majority accepts rights to be true.
04-13-2017 11:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Old Mario games Sunbourn 12 839 01-17-2017 12:47 PM
Last Post: Superkamiguru
  Favorite mario kart power up? monkey 5 434 01-03-2010 09:39 PM
Last Post: aaaaaaasd
  The super-super unofficial Friday the 13th 'event' game McGee! 3 433 11-14-2009 11:06 PM
Last Post: Fire Elf
  Impossible Japanese Mario SilenceXEmotion 7 1,013 03-20-2008 05:15 AM
Last Post: goodusername
  Mario Kart DS aaaaaaasd 4 704 02-17-2008 09:15 PM
Last Post: aaaaaaasd

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | School Survival | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication