RIP School Survival Forums
August 2001 - June 2017

The School Survival Forums are permanently retired. If you need help with quitting school, unsupportive parents or anything else, there is a list of resources on the Help Page.

To everyone who joined these forums at some point, and got discouraged by the negativity and left after a while (or even got literally scared off): I'm sorry.

I wasn't good enough at encouraging people to be kinder, and removing people who refuse to be kind. Encouraging people is hard, and removing people creates conflict, and I hate conflict... so that's why I wasn't better at it.

I was a very, very sensitive teen. The atmosphere of this forum as it is now, if it had existed in 1996, would probably have upset me far more than it would have helped.

I can handle quite a lot of negativity and even abuse now, but that isn't the point. I want to help people. I want to help the people who need it the most, and I want to help people like the 1996 version of me.

I'm still figuring out the best way to do that, but as it is now, these forums are doing more harm than good, and I can't keep running them.

Thank you to the few people who have tried to understand my point of view so far. I really, really appreciate you guys. You are beautiful people.

Everyone else: If after everything I've said so far, you still don't understand my motivations, I think it's unlikely that you will. We're just too different. Maybe someday in the future it might make sense, but until then, there's no point in arguing about it. I don't have the time or the energy for arguing anymore. I will focus my time and energy on people who support me, and those who need help.

-SoulRiser

The forums are mostly read-only and are in a maintenance/testing phase, before being permanently archived. Please use this time to get the contact details of people you'd like to keep in touch with. Send me a message if you'd like to keep in touch with me & Steve.

Please do not make a mirror copy of the forums in their current state - things will still change, and some people have requested to be able to edit or delete some of their personal info.


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Statutory Laws
Author Message
..V.. Offline
Party Rebel

Posts: 716
Joined: Jan 2012
Thanks: 3
Given 40 thank(s) in 29 post(s)
Post: #1
Statutory Laws

What are your views on the statutory laws?

http://www.zoklet.net/totse/community/ar...59000.html

http://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussio...-or-needed

http://skepchick.org/2013/01/cross-post-...tory-rape/

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/13/findla...index.html

http://www.sexlaws.org/what_is_statutory_rape1

(This post was last modified: 07-20-2014 09:24 AM by ..V...)
07-20-2014 09:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #2
Statutory Laws

Huh, I actually had a dream last night about statutory laws.

Personally, I think they're total BS. I don't see why the gov't needs to intervene in a consensual relationship because of age.

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
07-20-2014 10:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Avatar Korra
brainiac3397 Offline
Machiavellian Amoeba

Posts: 9,823
Joined: Feb 2013
Thanks: 20
Given 1983 thank(s) in 1428 post(s)
Post: #3
Statutory Laws

I find them silly.

Personality DNA Report
(06-14-2013 08:02 AM)Potato Wrote:  watch the fuq out, we've got an "intellectual" over here.

Hidden stuff:
[Image: watch-out-we-got-a-badass-over-here-meme-240x180.png]
Brainiac3397's Mental Health Status Log Wrote:[Image: l0Iy5HKskJO5XD3Wg.gif]
07-20-2014 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
True Strasserist Offline
Banned

Posts: 417
Joined: Jan 2009
Thanks: 3
Given 31 thank(s) in 11 post(s)
Post: #4
RE: Statutory Laws

Statutory rape is rarely ever actual rape.

[Image: AQUoEoe.jpg] [Image: L4WpLmZ.png]

School and the Allegory of the Cave Shooter | Username has no girlfriend! | Moon man, Moon man, can't you see?
07-23-2014 08:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: KFC Nyan Cat , Sociopath , Avatar Korra , Superkamiguru , The man , Rule_BreakerXVIII
School Offline
Call me Raz

Posts: 51
Joined: Jul 2014
Thanks: 6
Given 41 thank(s) in 27 post(s)
Post: #5
Statutory Laws

Statutory rape laws take consensual interactions and legally classify them as rape and have helped to create a culture where consent is rape anyway because some people don't like it.

Basically they are complete and utter bullshit and an affront to youth rights and freedom.

In that forum on Penny Arcade you will read some of the idiotic defenses of statutory rape charges against people they deem "too old".

One guy said a 17 year old consensually fucking a 16 year old is okay but if the 17 year old is 25 then he/she should go to jail. For a little anecdote at 17 I was much more disrespectful about girls and sex because I was raised with the conservative viewpoints. Now, in my late 20s I would be a much much better lover for a consenting 16 year old. I understand the nuances better and the importance of mutual benefit and pleasure and I also know how much more exciting and fun sexual contact is when both parties are into it and having fun.

This is ignoring that the poster doesn't seem to realize 16 is legal in many US states and most of the world in general. So he is advocating making illegal something that is legal.

Another issue is this literally insults victims of actual rape.

EDIT: To add, saying "well they can't consent because they are incapable of consenting so it actually is rape" is one of the most idiotic arguments I have ever read in my entire life and anyone who uses it is employing some serious cognitive distortions and rationalizations to support a moral view they have that has no place in law.

You can call me Raz

Current Game I'm Playing:
[Image: Eliwood_lord_sword_zps56a7be95.gif]
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2014 11:54 PM by School.)
07-23-2014 11:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Sociopath , Avatar Korra , Superkamiguru , Rule_BreakerXVIII
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 83 thank(s) in 52 post(s)
Post: #6
RE: Statutory Laws

(07-23-2014 08:17 AM)True Strasserist Wrote:  Statutory rape is rarely ever actual rape.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-17-2017 03:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 83 thank(s) in 52 post(s)
Post: #7
RE: Statutory Laws

(07-23-2014 11:47 PM)School Wrote:  Statutory rape laws take consensual interactions and legally classify them as rape and have helped to create a culture where consent is rape anyway because some people don't like it.

Basically they are complete and utter bullshit and an affront to youth rights and freedom.

In that forum on Penny Arcade you will read some of the idiotic defenses of statutory rape charges against people they deem "too old".

One guy said a 17 year old consensually fucking a 16 year old is okay but if the 17 year old is 25 then he/she should go to jail. For a little anecdote at 17 I was much more disrespectful about girls and sex because I was raised with the conservative viewpoints. Now, in my late 20s I would be a much much better lover for a consenting 16 year old. I understand the nuances better and the importance of mutual benefit and pleasure and I also know how much more exciting and fun sexual contact is when both parties are into it and having fun.

This is ignoring that the poster doesn't seem to realize 16 is legal in many US states and most of the world in general. So he is advocating making illegal something that is legal.

Another issue is this literally insults victims of actual rape.

EDIT: To add, saying "well they can't consent because they are incapable of consenting so it actually is rape" is one of the most idiotic arguments I have ever read in my entire life and anyone who uses it is employing some serious cognitive distortions and rationalizations to support a moral view they have that has no place in law.
This.

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

01-22-2017 12:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Avatar Korra , The man
thewake Offline
Unconstructive

Posts: 5,917
Joined: Jun 2007
Thanks: 78
Given 295 thank(s) in 201 post(s)
Post: #8
RE: Statutory Laws

What if a 13 year old fucks his hot 20/30-something-year-old teacher?

[Image: nAOqYk7.png]

[Image: USVWSwj.png]
01-23-2017 11:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1491
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #9
Statutory Laws

Sorry for the bump, but Holy Shit I hate these laws so much. I want to freaking cry every time an adult goes to jail for consensually being with someone under 18. Who the fucking hell do the people making these laws think they are to decide when an individual person is mentally and physically ready to do these things?

Also, how the fuck is it completely normal and okay for 2 minors to have sex, but if one of them is an adult it is rape? So, it's only consent if it is between people of the similar age? Confused

Most people I hear arguing for these laws make it sound like we are living in Codename: Kids Next Door and all adults are evil. Well, actually they describe it more like adults can be awesome people who we can befriend and have fun with, but they somehow turn into pure evil manipulative bastards who are "taking advantage" of poor innocent young people the second they fuck. What the hell..

They also ALWAYS say shit like, "But people under 18 are underdeveloped, and not mature enough to have sex."
Those people are negatively generalizing whole age groups here. All I see in that statement is an attempt make, "I think young people are idiots who lack rational thought," sound scientific.

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
03-11-2017 01:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: The man
the Analogist Offline
Connector of Dots

Posts: 820
Joined: Feb 2016
Thanks: 231
Given 434 thank(s) in 261 post(s)
Post: #10
RE: Statutory Laws

so my wife was 17 when we married. I used to imagine the exotic scenario of "oh, no no no officer, I got the forms right here!"

Purity is to Believe only that which deserves it.
Wisdom is to follow only the Opinion which makes the best use of evidence.
Excellence is to be mindful of all these things in Living.
Follow me on Twitter!
03-11-2017 01:58 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Avatar Korra , The man
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1491
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #11
Statutory Laws

bump

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
03-19-2017 02:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #12
Statutory Laws

Hah, such an old thread.

My position still stands. Statutory/age of consent laws are steaming piles of shit. "Statutory rape" is rarely actual rape. Not to mention these laws seem to cause more media shitstorms than serve an actual purpose.

I've always leaned towards "free love", though definitely to a limit. Shit like NAMBLA is fucking weird. Plus I don't want pedos everywhere, though to be honest I'm legitimately curious as to whether statutory/age of consent laws have an actual effect, kinda like drug laws.

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
03-19-2017 03:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Avatar Korra , The man
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1491
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #13
Statutory Laws

I read something about how people are more interested in doing things once they are made illegal. I think it was http://www.sophiagubb.com/obligation-vs-responsibility/.
Most people wouldn't want to risk it since the penalty is decades (I think) in prison. Though, others know it doesn't matter as long as you aren't caught. When I was on the Whisper app I mentioned that was 16 and I found adults attractive and I got immediately these messages:
"Nothing is illegal if you don't get caught"
"I bet you'd taste amazing."
"I love you."
"I'd fuck you anyway."
"How old do you like?"
"I love teens! How old are you?"

I doubt those people care. xD

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
03-20-2017 03:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: The man
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #14
Statutory Laws

Lol those be some shady people on there. The internet is a magical place.

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
03-20-2017 05:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Avatar Korra
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1491
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #15
Statutory Laws

I wonder if the guy from To Catch A Predator would ever Whisper for the show.

(I fucking hate that show)

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
03-29-2017 11:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #16
Statutory Laws

Didn't that dude get arrested for underage dating or something?

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
03-29-2017 02:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
brainiac3397 Offline
Machiavellian Amoeba

Posts: 9,823
Joined: Feb 2013
Thanks: 20
Given 1983 thank(s) in 1428 post(s)
Post: #17
Statutory Laws

To update to my comment of me finding it silly, there are legitimate concerns when it involves the abuse of authority or risk thereof.

Personality DNA Report
(06-14-2013 08:02 AM)Potato Wrote:  watch the fuq out, we've got an "intellectual" over here.

Hidden stuff:
[Image: watch-out-we-got-a-badass-over-here-meme-240x180.png]
Brainiac3397's Mental Health Status Log Wrote:[Image: l0Iy5HKskJO5XD3Wg.gif]
03-30-2017 01:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #18
Statutory Laws

Yeah. Imagine all the teachers pimping out there.

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
03-30-2017 01:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
the Analogist Offline
Connector of Dots

Posts: 820
Joined: Feb 2016
Thanks: 231
Given 434 thank(s) in 261 post(s)
Post: #19
RE: Statutory Laws

when cultural prejudice by rule respects certain groups, some very odd people will be attracted.

a firefighter who went to my high school got put in prison for doing things with a baby....

Purity is to Believe only that which deserves it.
Wisdom is to follow only the Opinion which makes the best use of evidence.
Excellence is to be mindful of all these things in Living.
Follow me on Twitter!
04-01-2017 10:03 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #20
Statutory Laws

What the hell...

context?

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
04-01-2017 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
the Analogist Offline
Connector of Dots

Posts: 820
Joined: Feb 2016
Thanks: 231
Given 434 thank(s) in 261 post(s)
Post: #21
RE: Statutory Laws

"oh wow he's a firefighter! you guys are so great by definition, i now love and respect you. you used to be so weird..."

Purity is to Believe only that which deserves it.
Wisdom is to follow only the Opinion which makes the best use of evidence.
Excellence is to be mindful of all these things in Living.
Follow me on Twitter!
04-01-2017 01:21 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
James Comey Away
Banished Oldfaf in Exile

Posts: 6,519
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks: 1081
Given 2292 thank(s) in 1517 post(s)
Post: #22
Statutory Laws

Oh. That kind of guy.

RIP GWEDIN
RIP URITIYOGI
RIP NIGHT
RIP VONUNOV
RIP WES/THEWAKE
RIP USERNAME

[Image: Nas-One-Love.jpg]

Stop jerking off to porn and whining and do something about it

Make School Survival Great Again - MSSGA

Hidden stuff:

[Image: BallsofSteel2.png]
[Image: mg_michelle_2020.png]
04-01-2017 02:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
the Analogist Offline
Connector of Dots

Posts: 820
Joined: Feb 2016
Thanks: 231
Given 434 thank(s) in 261 post(s)
Post: #23
RE: Statutory Laws

such types would be attracted to various careers

Purity is to Believe only that which deserves it.
Wisdom is to follow only the Opinion which makes the best use of evidence.
Excellence is to be mindful of all these things in Living.
Follow me on Twitter!
04-01-2017 02:28 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Statutory Rape SethyDavidG 31 4,146 03-30-2017 11:37 AM
Last Post: James Comey

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | School Survival | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication