Could a heterosexual person enjoy sex with their gender?

[..V..]

If a man enjoys sex with a man for the physical, pleasurable part, but does not look at that gender with emotion or feelings, then could they still be considered heterosexual?
Being homosexual or bisexual means that one has feelings for people in their gender (I don't say only one person because things could happen and feelings are complex). but simply liking something for the pleasure of it is just pleasure.
Similar to how heterosexual females could make out, but they could still be considered heterosexual.
Personally I think liking something because it pleasures you should not be labeled, but feelings could be labeled.
But sexual orientation is a complex thing and shouldn't be labeled to begin with.
People like different things emotionally and physically.

[Alucard483]

All women are naturally bisexual. It is simply an equation of alcohol applied, social settings and how hot the other girl is.

[SoulRiser]

Simply based on title... probably.

Whether or not that will happen depends on a whole bunch of things that will vary from one person to the next.

As for the labels, I say meh. I think they often complicate things more than they clarify things.

[brainiac3397]

Could be, but it's complex and unpredictable.

Like, you take a heterosexual male and a transexual(Male to Female, but retains the male organ). I think it's more likely to happen then a heterosexual male with another "obvious" male.

But every person will have some varying level of sexual "openness" that decides whether they'll only strictly have sex with just women, or if they'll consider others.

[Sunbourn]

Quote:Like, you take a heterosexual male and a transexual(Male to Female, but retains the male organ). I think it's more likely to happen then a heterosexual male with another "obvious" male.

Good point. I'd happily go for a passable transexual so long as I find her attractive of course. However I won't have sex with another man. I find the thought of doing so repulsive and have never actually found myself attracted to my own gender. I know of at least one other guy in person who has admitted to wanting to have sex with a passable trans as well.

[brainiac3397]

(05-03-2013 05:44 AM)|55555| Wrote:  

Quote:Like, you take a heterosexual male and a transexual(Male to Female, but retains the male organ). I think it's more likely to happen then a heterosexual male with another "obvious" male.

Good point. I'd happily go for a passable transexual so long as I find her attractive of course. However I won't have sex with another man. I find the thought of doing so repulsive and have never actually found myself attracted to my own gender. I know of at least one other guy in person who has admitted to wanting to have sex with a passable trans as well.

Yep. It's pretty weird but evidence that while sex with the opposite sex is enjoyed, humans will still have some "fetish" or curiosity to go along with the basic stuff.

I think the Kama Sutra shows how we went from simple "breeding sex" to "Fun Sex" with all those insane positions.

[Sunbourn]

(05-03-2013 05:54 AM)brainiac3397 Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 05:44 AM)|55555| Wrote:  

Quote:Like, you take a heterosexual male and a transexual(Male to Female, but retains the male organ). I think it's more likely to happen then a heterosexual male with another "obvious" male.

Good point. I'd happily go for a passable transexual so long as I find her attractive of course. However I won't have sex with another man. I find the thought of doing so repulsive and have never actually found myself attracted to my own gender. I know of at least one other guy in person who has admitted to wanting to have sex with a passable trans as well.

Yep. It's pretty weird but evidence that while sex with the opposite sex is enjoyed, humans will still have some "fetish" or curiosity to go along with the basic stuff.

I think the Kama Sutra shows how we went from simple "breeding sex" to "Fun Sex" with all those insane positions.

Humans aren't the only ones who indulge in sex with the same gender.

[thewake]

Can a vegetarian eat meat and still be a vegetarian?

[Ahab]

The orientation distinctions are kind of dumb. Heterosexuals are prone to having homosexual experiences here and there. Sensations can be enjoyed, but it doesn't mean the whole of it is enjoyed. Think prison sex.

[thewake]

Nah, I'm pretty sure if you fuck a guy you're not straight. It's like the one drop rule, but in this case it's the one cock rule.

[brainiac3397]

(05-05-2013 02:35 PM)Wes Wrote:  Nah, I'm pretty sure if you fuck a guy you're not straight. It's like the one drop rule, but in this case it's the one cock rule.

And if you don't have a distinction based on current societal views?(like the example I always use: Romans)

[thewake]

(05-05-2013 02:38 PM)brainiac3397 Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:35 PM)Wes Wrote:  Nah, I'm pretty sure if you fuck a guy you're not straight. It's like the one drop rule, but in this case it's the one cock rule.

And if you don't have a distinction based on current societal views?(like the example I always use: Romans)

Then you're obviously a queer lover.

[brainiac3397]

(05-05-2013 02:40 PM)Wes Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:38 PM)brainiac3397 Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:35 PM)Wes Wrote:  Nah, I'm pretty sure if you fuck a guy you're not straight. It's like the one drop rule, but in this case it's the one cock rule.

And if you don't have a distinction based on current societal views?(like the example I always use: Romans)

Then you're obviously a queer lover.

Well the Romans only worked on two simple distinctions of fucked and fucker. If your latter was more than your former, good for you!

So I guess the word queer would be correct in this circumstance, IF I had agreed with the basic distinctions of the Romans.

[thewake]

(05-05-2013 02:44 PM)brainiac3397 Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:40 PM)Wes Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:38 PM)brainiac3397 Wrote:  

(05-05-2013 02:35 PM)Wes Wrote:  Nah, I'm pretty sure if you fuck a guy you're not straight. It's like the one drop rule, but in this case it's the one cock rule.

And if you don't have a distinction based on current societal views?(like the example I always use: Romans)

Then you're obviously a queer lover.

Well the Romans only worked on two simple distinctions of fucked and fucker. If your latter was more than your former, good for you!

So I guess the word queer would be correct in this circumstance, IF I had agreed with the basic distinctions of the Romans.

I don't get why you'd bring up other dead societies when the society we live in now has a pretty clear distinction between gay and straight. It's really irrelevant to this discussion when the discussion presupposes that we are using the definitions that our current society provides.

[..V..]

I think a person could be straight and enjoy sex with their gender. I view sexuality an emotional thing. Is somebody is just having it for the pleasure, feel free to.

[Trekkie_Aspie]

Nope. Heterosexuals couldn't enjoy sex with their own gender, almost by definition However, I do think that 'true', for lack of a better word, hetrosexuals and 'true' , with the same caveat, homosexuals are extremely rare. I think though that well, long story, but basically Kinsely was about right. I'd call anyone less than about a 2, 'straight' for everyday purposes and anyone more than about a '4' gay, for everyday purposes - bi is 2-4.

So if we assume that round about 90% of the population tends toward lower numbers (straight, for practical purposes) and the 10% (gay and bi, for practial purposes) towards higher numbers.. I think it might break down something like this:

Of the 90% straight population:

Maybe 10% are 0s.
That makes the remaining 80% about a 1 (inclined to have sex with the same gender if conditions are right - e.g. alcohol and/or massive hotness is involved)

Here, I'm going to make the assumption that of the 10% who identify as gay or bi (it's lumped together for stastic purposes), about 5% are gay and about 5% are bi.


Of the 5% that are bi, I figure maybe something like:

1-2% are a 2
1-2% are a 3
1-2% are a 4

Finally, of the 5% that are gay, I figure something like:

4% of those gay people are a 5
and the remaining 1% are a 6.

Something like that, only very rough of course.

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=ht...BA&dur=433