RIP School Survival Forums
August 2001 - June 2017

The School Survival Forums are permanently retired. If you need help with quitting school, unsupportive parents or anything else, there is a list of resources on the Help Page.

If you want to write about your experiences in school, you can write on our blog.

To everyone who joined these forums at some point, and got discouraged by the negativity and left after a while (or even got literally scared off): I'm sorry.

I wasn't good enough at encouraging people to be kinder, and removing people who refuse to be kind. Encouraging people is hard, and removing people creates conflict, and I hate conflict... so that's why I wasn't better at it.

I was a very, very sensitive teen. The atmosphere of this forum as it is now, if it had existed in 1996, would probably have upset me far more than it would have helped.

I can handle quite a lot of negativity and even abuse now, but that isn't the point. I want to help people. I want to help the people who need it the most, and I want to help people like the 1996 version of me.

I'm still figuring out the best way to do that, but as it is now, these forums are doing more harm than good, and I can't keep running them.

Thank you to the few people who have tried to understand my point of view so far. I really, really appreciate you guys. You are beautiful people.

Everyone else: If after everything I've said so far, you still don't understand my motivations, I think it's unlikely that you will. We're just too different. Maybe someday in the future it might make sense, but until then, there's no point in arguing about it. I don't have the time or the energy for arguing anymore. I will focus my time and energy on people who support me, and those who need help.

-SoulRiser

The forums are mostly read-only and are in a maintenance/testing phase, before being permanently archived. Please use this time to get the contact details of people you'd like to keep in touch with. My contact details are here.

Please do not make a mirror copy of the forums in their current state - things will still change, and some people have requested to be able to edit or delete some of their personal info.


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election
Author Message
HeartofShadows Offline
Fanatic

Posts: 8,557
Joined: Dec 2006
Thanks: 0
Given 80 thank(s) in 73 post(s)
Post: #1
The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

Quote:We are never going to restore legitimacy to our political system until we get the money out of politics. Typically, in federal elections the candidate that raises the most money wins about 90 percent of the time. In 2008, Barack Obama raised almost twice as much money as John McCain did. 3 of the top 7 donors to Obama's campaign were big Wall Street banks (Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup). Now Wall Street is doing it again. The big Wall Street banks are already trying to buy the 2012 election. So who do they want to win in 2012? Based on contribution patterns so far, the overwhelming favorite of the Wall Street banks to win in 2012 is Mitt Romney. The big Wall Street banks have given to Romney as pile of money that is more than 4 times larger than they have given to anyone else. Even though most Republicans really don't want him, if history is any indication this means that Mitt Romney is going to be the Republican nominee for president in 2012.

Posted below are numbers from a recent analysis done by the Center for Responsive Politics. These numbers reflect monetary donations to presidential candidates by employees of these big Wall Street banks (and their wives) between January and September 2011.

As you can see, somehow Mitt Romney is at the top of each list by a wide margin. Clearly there is a "consensus" (some would call it a conspiracy) among the Wall Street elite that Romney is the man for the job.

When you want to find out what is really going on in American politics, just follow the money. If Mitt Romney does not win the Republican nomination, it is going to be a massive upset. History tells us that it is incredibly difficult to overcome the kind of monetary advantage that Romney is piling up.

Once again, the following numbers were put together by the Center for Responsive Politics. As you can see, Wall Street is once again trying to buy an election, and they very clearly want Mitt Romney to win the Republican nomination....

Goldman Sachs

Mitt Romney: $352,200
Barack Obama: $49,124
Tim Pawlenty: $25,000
Jon Huntsman: $6,750
Rick Perry: $5,500
Ron Paul: $2,500

Morgan Stanley

Mitt Romney: $184,800
Tim Pawlenty: $41,715
Barack Obama: $28,225
Rick Perry: $20,750
Jon Huntsman: $9,750
Newt Gingrich: $1,000
Ron Paul: $1,000
Herman Cain: $500

Bank of America

Mitt Romney: $112,500
Barack Obama: $46,699
Tim Pawlenty: $12,750
Jon Huntsman: $4,250
Ron Paul: $3,451
Rick Perry: $2,600
Thad McCotter: $2,000
Herman Cain: $750
Michele Bachmann: $500
Newt Gingrich: $250

JPMorgan Chase

Mitt Romney: $107,250
Barack Obama: $38,039
Rick Perry: $27,050
Tim Pawlenty: $16,750
Jon Huntsman: $7,500
Ron Paul: $5,451

Citigroup

Mitt Romney: $56,550
Barack Obama: $36,887
Tim Pawlenty: $5,300
Rick Perry: $3,000
Herman Cain: $1,465
Michele Bachmann: $1,000
Ron Paul: $702

As you can see, no other Republican candidate even comes close to Romney at any of these big Wall Street banks.

In fact, of the candidates that are left in the Republican race, Mitt Romney has raised 13 times as much Wall Street money as anyone else has.

The following are the overall donation numbers from employees of the big Wall Street banks and their wives....

Mitt Romney: $813,300
Barack Obama: $198,874
Tim Pawlenty: $101,515
Rick Perry: $58,900
Jon Huntsman: $28,250
Ron Paul: $13,104
Herman Cain: $2,715
Michelle Bachmann: $1,500
Newt Gingrich: $1,250

These numbers paint a very disturbing picture. Even though Romney's poll numbers are in the mid to low 20s most of the time, employees of the big Wall Street banks gave him $813,300 during the first 9 months of this year and they only gave $105,719 to the rest of the Republican candidates combined.

Hopefully the American people will wake up and will think for themselves.

But we have seen this story play out time after time after time before.

The candidate with the most money almost always wins. The establishment is almost always able to pick the candidates that they want, and the rest of us are often left with trying to choose between "the lesser of two evils".

A while back, Dylan Ratigan absolutely lost in on air during a panel discussion on MSNBC. This epic rant about money in politics is not something that you will often see in the mainstream media, and it contains a lot of truth....





Ratigan is right about this issue. We do have a bought Congress. We also have a bought president.

If Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination and the general election in 2012, we will have yet another bought president.

Until we get the money out of politics, we will continue to have a situation where it seems like nothing ever changes no matter who we send to Washington D.C.

The way that election laws are written right now, the big Wall Street banks and the ultra-wealthy are able to have a much greater say in who gets elected than the rest of us do.

It is fundamentally wrong and it has turned our political process into a giant farce. Instead of being "elected", most of the time our politicians are "selected" for us by the establishment.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archive...2-election

[Image: WARZONES_subs_hostility.png]
image hosting jpg
(This post was last modified: 10-19-2011 11:41 AM by HeartofShadows.)
10-19-2011 11:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UnschoolShqiponjë Offline
Fanatic

Posts: 3,622
Joined: May 2011
Thanks: 1
Given 221 thank(s) in 148 post(s)
Post: #2
RE: The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

I really don't think I am going to vote this time around. Maybe I'll ask my seven year old cousin who she thinks should be president and vote for her... meh the idea entertains me greatly. Might do it for lulz.

Live until you die
[Image: Untitled-1.png]
(This post was last modified: 10-19-2011 12:24 PM by UnschoolShqiponjë.)
10-19-2011 12:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Absnt Offline
Fanatic

Posts: 6,075
Joined: Dec 2009
Thanks: 13
Given 184 thank(s) in 127 post(s)
Post: #3
RE: The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

http://archive.fairvote.org/reports/mono...smith.html

and

http://www.campaignfreedom.org/research/...-campaigns

and

Freakonomics the book. Accompanied by this: http://www.freakonomics.com/2008/02/12/d...tt-romney/

But then again, you have this:

http://www.freakonomics.com/2008/01/15/h...he-author/

Fucking confusing. But it's safe to say that money does, infact, play a pretty good sized role. At least in smaller elections...

Blog I post to now:
http://blog.darknedgy.net

Edfreedom.org -- An organization for more freedom in education.
http://www.edfreedom.org/join-us/
10-19-2011 12:22 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aaaaaaasd Offline
Grorious Moddu

Posts: 7,344
Joined: Oct 2007
Thanks: 1
Given 50 thank(s) in 38 post(s)
Post: #4
RE: The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

This is basically the Early Bird catching the Worm, except replace Bird with Bank and Worm with Corrupt As Shit Electoral Congress
10-20-2011 12:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Liquid Offline
poison - do not drink

Posts: 1,050
Joined: Aug 2007
Thanks: 0
Given 2 thank(s) in 2 post(s)
Post: #5
RE: The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

The banks want the winner to owe them.

Remember that they gave money to both Republicans and Democrats last time. Also, the politicians in congress owing them is the reason they got bailed out - with support of both parties.

//

[Image: techhoops5.jpg]
10-20-2011 03:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Absnt Offline
Fanatic

Posts: 6,075
Joined: Dec 2009
Thanks: 13
Given 184 thank(s) in 127 post(s)
Post: #6
RE: The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election

(10-20-2011 03:58 AM)Liquid Wrote:  The banks want the winner to owe them.

Remember that they gave money to both Republicans and Democrats last time. Also, the politicians in congress owing them is the reason they got bailed out - with support of both parties.

Makes sense. Which is also a massive problem.

Blog I post to now:
http://blog.darknedgy.net

Edfreedom.org -- An organization for more freedom in education.
http://www.edfreedom.org/join-us/
10-20-2011 07:32 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  This US election map shows something very interesting James Comey 8 2,190 04-11-2017 05:54 AM
Last Post: James Comey
  Iran's banks to be blocked from global banking system HeartofShadows 1 1,100 03-17-2012 10:10 AM
Last Post: iexist
Thumbs Down Election Fraud in canada... avrillavigne12251 0 1,159 02-26-2012 05:54 PM
Last Post: avrillavigne12251
  Wall Street Mocks Protesters By Drinking Champagne 2011 HeartofShadows 31 13,224 11-27-2011 12:06 PM
Last Post: Efs
  Feds Is Using Your Money To Bail Out European banks again HeartofShadows 18 3,364 11-03-2011 08:21 AM
Last Post: Liquid
  Wall Street protests .Manicrose. 11 4,972 10-20-2011 07:54 PM
Last Post: John Frum
Exclamation Wall Street Protests: Police Brutality aaaaaaasd 36 15,122 10-08-2011 04:45 PM
Last Post: HeartofShadows
  cops beating people up at occupy wall street HeartofShadows 0 1,078 10-08-2011 01:50 AM
Last Post: HeartofShadows
  UK General Election aaaaaaasd 13 3,145 04-16-2010 09:34 AM
Last Post: John Tuttle
  2012 thewake 143 17,731 01-16-2010 09:09 AM
Last Post: Loxor

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | School Survival | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication