Poll: Y/N?

Rebelnerd · 09-02-2008 02:31 AM

WTF? the site gets raided a few times and now half the people who voted want to censor someone? what happened?

Milk2Go · 09-02-2008 02:34 AM

They're jealous of my ability to create threads at a speed of 120 topics/minute.

Darthmat · 09-02-2008 02:35 AM

Thank you for proving my point for me. Smile

Dark Soul X · 09-02-2008 02:38 AM

BobManPerson Wrote:They're jealous of my ability to create threads at a speed of 120 topics/minute.

No, we're just tired of the shit that comes out your mouth. I'll admit, I am a tweener in this vote. While I haven't known you that long, so I would vote no...But I have seen some stupid shit from you. More than I've ever posted back in the day when I was a newbie.

I'm just glad you aren't a mod. Probably fuck up everything and turn people's posts into something stupid. This is General Talk, and I don't really feel like flaming you anyway. Just change your act, dude. Stop being an asshole.

Milk2Go · 09-02-2008 02:41 AM

Dark Soul X Wrote:I'm just glad you aren't a mod. Probably fuck up everything and turn people's posts into something stupid.

I actually used to be a mod back at 72dpi's forum.
The only reason my mod powers were revoked was because I flammed half of the active forum to an "unacceptable extent" while I was having a bad day.

Dark Soul X · 09-02-2008 02:42 AM

BobManPerson Wrote:
Dark Soul X Wrote:I'm just glad you aren't a mod. Probably fuck up everything and turn people's posts into something stupid.
I actually used to be a mod back at 72dpi's forum.

What made you descend so much?

aaaaaaasd · 09-02-2008 02:42 AM

I think everyone is overeacting.
You don't have to read his threads.

Dark Soul X · 09-02-2008 02:44 AM

Bad_Engrish_FalconPunch Wrote:I think everyone is overeacting.
You don't have to read his threads.

That's a truth: Everyone can just put him on the ignore list, but someon's bound to make the shit happen all over again anyway.

KitsuneSefam · 09-02-2008 05:06 AM

Dark Soul X Wrote:
BobManPerson Wrote:They're jealous of my ability to create threads at a speed of 120 topics/minute.

No, we're just tired of the shit that comes out your mouth. I'll admit, I am a tweener in this vote. While I haven't known you that long, so I would vote no...But I have seen some stupid shit from you. More than I've ever posted back in the day when I was a newbie.

I'm just glad you aren't a mod. Probably fuck up everything and turn people's posts into something stupid. This is General Talk, and I don't really feel like flaming you anyway. Just change your act, dude. Stop being an asshole.

Yea, i agree, i'm tired too =/, he's dropping all his stupid crap on the forums while he actually have a blog to do it.

**SoulRiser** · 09-02-2008 05:13 AM

If anyone actually does this, I will revert it. Srsly, WTF? On SS? Noo

Since there's a poll I am assuming this isn't just a 'for the lulz' question, or else someone would have just done it, had some lulz, and then put it back.

How hard is it really to ignore threads?

Cosbydaf · 09-02-2008 05:19 AM

Quote:Since there's a poll I am assuming this isn't just a 'for the lulz' question

Actually, it was for the lulz.

KitsuneSefam · 09-02-2008 05:29 AM

Cosbydaf Wrote:
Quote:Since there's a poll I am assuming this isn't just a 'for the lulz' question

Actually, it was for the lulz.

lolz

Rebelnerd · 09-02-2008 10:12 AM

the censorship isn't the point. yeah, he's an immature dick with no friends. but remember what happened last time there was a real troll here? we gave into censorship just a little bit and now all of the sudden whenever anyone starts fucking around, someone inevitable starts a "should we ban?" thread. there's a slippery slope effect going on here and if we actually start banning people, it'll get much worse.

Milk2Go · 09-02-2008 11:24 AM

Rebelnerd Wrote:the censorship isn't the point. yeah, he's an immature dick with no friends. but remember what happened last time there was a real troll here? we gave into censorship just a little bit and now all of the sudden whenever anyone starts fucking around, someone inevitable starts a "should we ban?" thread. there's a slippery slope effect going on here and if we actually start banning people, it'll get much worse.

I fail to understand how you accuse me of having no friends and claim it as being the indisputable truth, yet have absolutely no proof to back it up.

Rebelnerd · 09-02-2008 12:38 PM

trolls tend not to have real friends. they have the same human need for attention but since they can't get it in real life for whatever reason, they turn to the internet. but by then they have so little social experiance and maturity that they can't make friendly contact, so they make pointless posts in hopes of getting a reaction. it's the same reason why preschool kids provoke their parents when they're bored; they consider negative attention to be better than nothing.

Rebelnerd · 09-02-2008 11:24 PM

but the term "troll" can be thrown around as easily as "terrorist." start banning trolls and what happens when the someone starts to loosen the definition just because they don't like somebody?

Darthmat · 09-02-2008 11:36 PM

Or we don't ban him and just stop him from making topics? You are blowing this waaay out of proportion.

Milk2Go · 09-03-2008 01:49 AM

Rebelnerd Wrote:trolls tend not to have real friends. they have the same human need for attention but since they can't get it in real life for whatever reason, they turn to the internet. but by then they have so little social experiance and maturity that they can't make friendly contact, so they make pointless posts in hopes of getting a reaction. it's the same reason why preschool kids provoke their parents when they're bored; they consider negative attention to be better than nothing.

I guess I'm one of those rare trolls that have real friends, then.

aaaaaaasd · 09-03-2008 01:51 AM

SoulRiser Wrote:If anyone actually does this, I will revert it. Srsly, WTF?

THE GREAT SOULRISER has spoken.
All hail her words of wisdom.
Now stfu everyone!

Happy Camper · 09-03-2008 04:06 AM

Rebelnerd Wrote:but the term "troll" can be thrown around as easily as "terrorist." start banning trolls and what happens when the someone starts to loosen the definition just because they don't like somebody?

I'm in agreement with Rebelnerd.

Darthmat · 09-03-2008 04:20 AM

When the fuck did anyone say anything about banning him? Stop talking about something completely irrelevant.

Rebelnerd · 09-03-2008 04:45 AM

i know we're not talking about banning him now, i'm saying any form of censorship can set a precedent that could lead to worse things.

Darthmat · 09-03-2008 04:55 AM

Oh, I love this philosophy. Let's not do A so it won't lead to B so it won't lead to C. Brilliant.

KitsuneSefam · 09-03-2008 06:40 AM

BobManPerson Wrote:
Rebelnerd Wrote:trolls tend not to have real friends. they have the same human need for attention but since they can't get it in real life for whatever reason, they turn to the internet. but by then they have so little social experiance and maturity that they can't make friendly contact, so they make pointless posts in hopes of getting a reaction. it's the same reason why preschool kids provoke their parents when they're bored; they consider negative attention to be better than nothing.
I guess I'm one of those rare trolls that have real friends, then.

You admit you're a troll. FAIL.

Gorebell · 09-03-2008 09:08 AM

Bob's a dumbass at times (Especially if he thinks the chans would help him), but he really doesn't fall under the definition of a troll. I'm honestly a little disgusted any of you are actually considering this, anyways.

Darthmat · 09-03-2008 09:28 AM

Gorebell, what does it feel like to be 'a little disgusted'?

Gorebell · 09-03-2008 09:46 AM

What do you mean by that?

Rebelnerd · 09-03-2008 10:34 AM

yeah, but the thing is these controversies usually go to a vote. if soul overrules a vote to ban it would open up a whole new debate, so i think it's just best if we just stand firm on the no censorship rule and not risk it.

Darthmat · 09-03-2008 10:44 AM

Total inflexibility, which you are suggesting, is not a good thing.

And this is not censorship. Why do people think it is?

**SoulRiser** · 09-03-2008 11:00 AM

Quote:there's a slippery slope effect going on here and if we actually start banning people, it'll get much worse.

That'll happen over my dead, bloody, mutilated corpse. Biggrin

Quote:Or we don't ban him and just stop him from making topics? You are blowing this waaay out of proportion.

He hasn't made all that many topics really. It's nowhere near as bad as that time thunder posted telling The Avenger to STFU like 2 million times all over the forums... but nobody seemed to mind that.

Quote:THE GREAT SOULRISER has spoken.
All hail her words of wisdom.
Now stfu everyone!

Quote:Oh, I love this philosophy. Let's not do A so it won't lead to B so it won't lead to C. Brilliant.

Yes, it is, actually. Because things have this weird tendency to evolve.

Quote:You admit you're a troll. FAIL.

And yet, he wasn't always a troll. Dunno what's up with that. Maybe he'll also stop trolling at some point. That'd be nice.

Quote:Well, I don't think that would happen since SoulRiser is pretty damn strict about that banning shit, and I doubt a ban on any member would go unnoticed, or unchallenged.

'SoulRiser' and 'strict' in the same sentence? Wtf

... lol

Quote:And this is not censorship. Why do people think it is?

Technically, no, it isn't "censorship", but it is limiting someone's ability to say whatever they want whenever they want.

All parts of the forums show who started a thread. You can easily just not open ones by BMP if it really bugs you that much.

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Should Bobmanperson have thread making privileges revoked?
Author	Message

Poll: Y/N?
	Yes
	Very Yes