creatonist stupidity

[i-am-the-liquor]

taken from a pm from whatshisface

Didn't I tell you that mice has the similar genes to human? So where did the mice comes from? My evidence are the same as yours, it just that we interpret the fact differently.

Here's you should look into those list of sites-

http://townhall.com/columnists/FrankPas ... sis?page=1

http://www.answersingenesis.org/article ... lly-evolve

Which came first, apes or humans? What is the missing link, there isn't any.

Based from what I seen in the bones of those apes. If it really occured, then more deformities would occurs in human head by now.



I believe in god as always. Why is there stories of angels, devils, and stuff like that made by non christian? Few stories are pure hallucination(Could be very few or none at all, I got a blinding headache and yet I don't get hallucination while it was to suppose to) or hoaxes or even real stories. We'll never know unless we do deep investigation to it. Some are stories example are in the bottom

http://www.angelsghosts.com/angel_story_stories.html
http://www.angelrealm.com
http://www.awitness.org/essays/devil.html

And the most important of all, ouija board incidents.
http://www.graveaddiction.com/ouija.html

The world is full of things that ain't discovered. And we have to choose a side because of that. There are many philosophy and religion and even both there. We have to choose one side out of the many. Don't get me wrong about this, but seriously we both need to open up our mind. There's a possibility.

If the world is full of things that are undiscovered. Then we don't know which is the true religion. I picked christian cause I believe in the bible.

I have the right to believe in god as same as you have the right not to believe in god. Why bother changing one another mind when it not worth it. I'm not trying to change your belief of god. I'm just trying to disprove evolution to you, nothing more and nothing less.


Edit:Take a look at this site. http://paleo.cc/paluxy.htm

[i-am-the-liquor]

more of it
I read some nonbiased comment and yet it won't change my mind. Life came from the nonlife. Give me a break. You ignore the fact that it is impossible and the science community tells lies. In the past, the world is considered to be flat while the bible considered it to be a spherical object. Ancient civilization proved it to be round.

http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/ScientificBible.htm
Take a look at ancient greek. Later on, Europeans believed the earth is flat. If you look into that site, it describes a hydrological process.

Since some science theory are discarded will make a science theory like evolution will eventually be discarded. You are brought into lies and you chose to believe it. This is mentioned into the bible that told that those who chose to believe in lie, god will put a evidence that is full of lie into the people that wants to believe in it.

Mutation doesn't support evolution. Look into evolution.

All the fact that you're trying to convince me that science is 100 percent true while it isn't 100 percent nor 0 percent true. This is a true meaning of science. Some theory are proven to be a lie and yet most people believes in it.

Are you getting pissed? Aw, can't handle the heat?

You ain't gonna convince me. And there's proof that not all christian are idiots and not all scientists are geniuses.

Dinosaur blood evidence-http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html

Evolution is one big joke! I love the imaginary concept behind it while I will not believe it true. It a satanic lie in a first place. Some creationist site have proven it. You are into a life that is aimed to evolution which isn't proven yet or will never be proven because it isn't true.

If evolution is true, the sun must have enough time to burn out our earth.

There is no vestigial part. Maybe except the males nipples. If you get your tailbone, please bent over and see what is the result.

Genetic alteration is scrambling of existing information.

Do me a favor, read over evolution and try to imagine any whole organism changing from a fox to a dolphin. The human mind is capable enough that it will take 3 million years to fill the brain. Try and imagine things from the after life. Try and imagine hydrogen and helium expansion while some turns into other elements that has more than 20 protons than helium.

Another proof of science lies.
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/ontogeny.html
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/mutations.html

Click on those two links plz. Look at the cat of Lilly and Gizmo, that is what real mutation is. Creationist believe mutation as a fact, and I won't debate against it.

Where did the single cell organism come from? How did it turn into something incredibly complex like humans which includes complex eyes, brains. As well as dolphin. It just too complex and the only way to do it is to be created.

Look at the porsche evolution
http://dasti.wz.cz/gallery/Porsche911Co ... lution.jpg
May look like evolution but it is rather of human creation works.

If you go into the evidence that I posted, you'll see I have way more evidence than you do and all you have is a piece of textbook.

[John Tuttle]

whose whatshisface? is it that sylizedcaarfan kid?

[i-am-the-liquor]

indeed it is

[Avenger]

this troll is funny LOL!

[i-am-the-liquor]

got more of it this morning, will post after a shower and some tea.

[i-am-the-liquor]

moar of er

Are you saying evolution is the only explanation of why are we here. It can't be one big accident. Radiometric dating and carbon dating all have flaws, no offense but that's the truth. Somewhere by 1990-2008 freshly dead seals have been dated, and it turns out to be 1300 years old, isn't that accurate lol. The fossils proves that there was giants according to the bible meaning the living fossil easily proves the young earth theory and some part of the bible. That's part evolution, but where are the skin to feature evolution proof and missing link to it. But there will never be full evolution.

Flaws of radiometric and carbon dating(Creationist explanation and non creationist explanation)
--------------------------
http://mall.turnpike.net/C/cs/basics/sld024.htm
http://www.essortment.com/hobbies/carbo ... c_szhq.htm
http://creationwiki.org/KBS_Tuff_shows_ ... ric_dating
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creatio ... /earth.asp
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_4.html

The big bang doesn't seem to explain enough. Like I said before an element cannot turn into a element more than 30 protons than the original one unless some other elements fused with it. Big bang isn't part of evolution but it a science history of how we're here. Face it, you're trying to prove to me everything in science is true while in reality it not 0% or 100% true. It never gonna be 100% true due to flaws.

And besides, evolution is part of life. It is considered that living things is magically appear long after the big bang. You considered yourself to be here because of a one cell organism turns into million of species meaning over 100,000,000,000,000,000 cells.

By living fossil I mean, the fossil was bigger than the original creature. Not the creature itself. It haven't adjusted the look in any way. Look into the damn living fossil site. Evolutionist can't explain anything of it and came up with a old age. Such idiots are evolutionist are, sir.

My feeling-
that is what he typed

[thewake]

Anyone who takes the Biblical creation story literally is blind.

[Milk2Go]

therenagadeoffunk Wrote:I'm not trying to change your belief of god. I'm just trying to disprove evolution to you[...]

I laughed.

[Darthmat]

W-Dog32 Wrote:Anyone who takes the Biblical creation story literally is blind.

Then how are they supposed to take it? Rhetorically?

[Michio-kun]

Darthmat Wrote:

W-Dog32 Wrote:Anyone who takes the Biblical creation story literally is blind.

Then how are they supposed to take it?

In the ass.

[thewake]

Darthmat Wrote:

W-Dog32 Wrote:Anyone who takes the Biblical creation story literally is blind.

Then how are they supposed to take it? Rhetorically?

With a grain of fucking salt.

[i-am-the-liquor]

fuckers trying to get me to use a ouija board as proof of god...my god this is just pathetic

[Avenger]

therenagadeoffunk Wrote:fuckers trying to get me to use a ouija board as proof of god...my god this is just pathetic

LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!

[i-am-the-liquor]

moar of it

Failures of Atheism: Does Atheism Do Less for People than Theism, Religion?

By Austin Cline, About.com
Filed In:

It's true that atheism does not dry any tearful eyes and does not relieve anyone's suffering. The problem with criticism of this lies with the fact that it inappropriately categorizes atheism as something which should be expected to dry tears and relieve pain. This is thus a myth because of the incorrect perception of what atheism is, what atheists believe, and what atheism should be doing. Atheism should not be expected to provide comfort or solace; atheist belief systems, however, can. Atheism Fails to Provide the Comforts of Religion
Atheism Cannot Explain the Origin of the Universe, Nature of Existence:
Technically speaking, this statement is true: atheism does not explain the origin of the universe or even the nature of existence itself. So if it's true, why is it treated here as a myth? The 'myth' part comes in because whoever is saying this is inappropriately categorizing atheism as something which should be expected to explain the universe and of all of existence. This is thus a myth because of the incorrect perception of what atheism is, what atheists believe, and what atheism should do. Atheism Cannot Explain the Origin of the Universe
Atheists Have No Reason to be Moral:
For most religious theists, their religion and god provide the basis for their entire understanding of morality and values. Because of this, they find it inconceivable that atheists who don’t' believe in any gods and who have no religion could possibly have a basis for morality or even understand what true moral behavior really is. Many go further and argue that this is a good reason to reject atheism, that it leads to immoral behavior, that it cannot account for the existence of morality, etc. None of these arguments hold up because they are based on false premises. Atheists Can Be Moral...
Atheists Lead Meaningless Lives of Despair Without Love or Beauty:
Theists who cannot defend theism or criticize atheism through logic or evidence are left attacking the alleged implications of atheism. Even if they cannot prove that atheism unreasonable, they hope to prove that the consequences of atheism are so abhorrent that no one will want to take the chance. Among the more popular targets are to claim that atheism leads to hopelessness and despair, that atheism makes life meaningless, or that atheism eliminates reasons to be moral. None of this is true, but even if it were that wouldn't make their theism or religion more likely to be true. Atheists Lead Meaningful Lives...
A Consistent Atheistic World View is Unlivable:
Most myths about atheism focus on just atheism itself and misrepresent it by attributing qualities to atheism that don't apply. Here we have a slight step forward in that we are dealing with a claim that at least involves beliefs beyond atheism — but it's still a myth because it attributes something to all possible atheistic world views. This is only possible by making assumptions about atheism itself; in this case, it's an assumption about materialism. The assumption is wrong because not all atheists are materialists and those who are do not experience these alleged problems. Consistent Atheism is Unlivable
It's Harder to be a Christian Than an Atheist; It's Easy to Not Believe:
Some religious believers, though mostly Christians in my experience, seem to have a need to perceive themselves as being persecuted and oppressed. Despite controlling all the levers of power in the American government, some Christians act like they are the powerless. I believe that this myth is a symptom of that attitude: the perceived need to be the one who is struggling the most and who is having the hardest time. The truth is that being religious in modern America is not a hard task because so much is set up to encourage or reinforce religious beliefs. Atheism is Easier than Christianity
Abstract Concepts are Immaterial, Depend on God & Theism:
Most atheists are materialists and naturalists, which means that they only accept the existence of a natural world made up of matter and energy. This means not believing in the existence of supernatural beings or anything not produced by matter and energy. For some strange reason, this gives some theists the idea that atheists must therefore be unable to consistently or logically accept that abstract concepts exist because they are not made out of matter. Abstract Concepts Depend on God?

You still can't explain the origin of the universe? You're ashamement to the human species.

this was sent in a pm this morning, also anotehr thing with ouija boards, this guy is such a moron.