RIP School Survival Forums
August 2001 - June 2017

The School Survival Forums are permanently retired. If you need help with quitting school, unsupportive parents or anything else, there is a list of resources on the Help Page.

If you want to write about your experiences in school, you can write on our blog.

To everyone who joined these forums at some point, and got discouraged by the negativity and left after a while (or even got literally scared off): I'm sorry.

I wasn't good enough at encouraging people to be kinder, and removing people who refuse to be kind. Encouraging people is hard, and removing people creates conflict, and I hate conflict... so that's why I wasn't better at it.

I was a very, very sensitive teen. The atmosphere of this forum as it is now, if it had existed in 1996, would probably have upset me far more than it would have helped.

I can handle quite a lot of negativity and even abuse now, but that isn't the point. I want to help people. I want to help the people who need it the most, and I want to help people like the 1996 version of me.

I'm still figuring out the best way to do that, but as it is now, these forums are doing more harm than good, and I can't keep running them.

Thank you to the few people who have tried to understand my point of view so far. I really, really appreciate you guys. You are beautiful people.

Everyone else: If after everything I've said so far, you still don't understand my motivations, I think it's unlikely that you will. We're just too different. Maybe someday in the future it might make sense, but until then, there's no point in arguing about it. I don't have the time or the energy for arguing anymore. I will focus my time and energy on people who support me, and those who need help.

-SoulRiser

The forums are mostly read-only and are in a maintenance/testing phase, before being permanently archived. Please use this time to get the contact details of people you'd like to keep in touch with. My contact details are here.

Please do not make a mirror copy of the forums in their current state - things will still change, and some people have requested to be able to edit or delete some of their personal info.


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Word association RELOADED
Author Message
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 69 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #2221
Word association RELOADED

superfluous

well would you look at the time its time to gay
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2017 10:58 AM by Geicosuave.)
02-18-2017 10:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 84 thank(s) in 52 post(s)
Post: #2222
Word association RELOADED

Call Of Duty

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

02-18-2017 12:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 69 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #2223
Word association RELOADED

resplendent

well would you look at the time its time to gay
02-18-2017 12:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Superkamiguru Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 202
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 770
Given 84 thank(s) in 52 post(s)
Post: #2224
Word association RELOADED

Mansion

Hidden stuff:
"CONSENSUAL incest is not wrong. (Abuse victims: being abused by a relative does not make it wrong for others to have consensual incest, any more than rape by a stranger makes all sex wrong. Sex and assault/molestation are two different things.) An aversion became common in humans that aided in population growth as one disease couldn't wipe out the human race. That's not a problem anymore.

Consensual incest is very common. You know people who have been involved, whether you know it or not.

There is no rational reason for keeping laws or taboos against consensual
incest that is consistently applied to other relationships. Personal disgust or religion is only a reason why one person would not want to personally engage in what I call consanguinamory, not why someone else shouldn't do it. An adult should be free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage with ANY consenting adults. Youthful experimentation between close relatives close in age is not uncommon, and there are more people than you'd think out there who are in lifelong healthy, happy relationships with a close relative. It isn't for everyone, but we're not all going to want to have each others' love lives, now are we? If someone thinks YOUR love life is disgusting, should you be thrown in prison?

Some people try to justify their prejudice against consanguineous sex and
marriage by being part-time eugenicists and saying that such relationships inevitably lead to “mutant” or “deformed” babies. This argument can be refuted on several fronts. 1. Some consanguineous relationships involve only people of the same gender. 2. Not all mixed-gender relationships birth biological children. 3. Most births to consanguineous parents do not produce children with significant birth defects or other genetic problems; while births to other parents do sometimes have birth defects. 4. We don’t prevent other people from marrying or deny them their reproductive rights based on increased odds of passing along a genetic problem or inherited disease. It is true that in general, children born to consanguineous parents have an increased chance of these problems than those born to nonconsanguineous parents, but the odds are still minimal. Unless someone is willing to deny reproductive rights and medical privacy to others and force everyone to take genetic tests and bar carriers and the congenitally disabled and women over 35 from having children, then equal protection principles prevent this from being a justification to bar this freedom of association and freedom to marry.

Some say "Your sibling should not be your lover." That is not a reason. It begs the question. Many people have many relationships that have more than one aspect. Some women say their sister is their best friend. Why can’t their sister be a wife, too?

Some say “There is a power differential.” This applies least of all to siblings or cousins who are close in age, but even where the power differential exists, it is not a justification for denying this freedom to sex or to marry. There is a power differential in just about any relationship, sometimes an enormous power differential. To question if consent is truly possible in these cases is insulting and demeaning.

Some say “There are so many people outside of your family." There are plenty of people within one’s own race, too, but that is no reason to ban interracial marriage. So, this isn't a good reason either. Let consenting adults love each other the way they want!"-Keith Pullman

02-19-2017 12:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 341
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1493
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #2225
Word association RELOADED

Murder mystery

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
02-19-2017 08:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 69 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #2226
Word association RELOADED

comedy

well would you look at the time its time to gay
02-19-2017 08:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2227
Word association RELOADED

bastard.
02-19-2017 08:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2228
RE: Word association RELOADED

sword

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-19-2017 01:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 69 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #2229
Word association RELOADED

blood

well would you look at the time its time to gay
02-19-2017 02:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2230
RE: Word association RELOADED

borne

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-19-2017 04:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2231
Word association RELOADED

Jason
02-20-2017 04:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Avatar Korra Offline
There is no cause of anything

Posts: 341
Joined: Jan 2017
Thanks: 1493
Given 204 thank(s) in 143 post(s)
Post: #2232
Word association RELOADED

Horror

"I’M BEGGING YOU, PRINCE ZUKO! It’s time for you to look inward and begin asking yourself the big question: who are you and what do YOU want?"
" While it is always best to believe in one’s self, a little help from others can be a great blessing"
-Uncle Iroh(Avatar: the Last Airbender)
02-20-2017 06:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2233
RE: Word association RELOADED

movie

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-20-2017 07:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2234
Word association RELOADED

Overrated
02-20-2017 07:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Geicosuave Offline
Gay Ass Demon

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec 2016
Thanks: 1
Given 69 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Post: #2235
Word association RELOADED

Frozen

well would you look at the time its time to gay
02-20-2017 07:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2236
Word association RELOADED

Wicked
02-20-2017 09:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2237
RE: Word association RELOADED

Trump

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-20-2017 09:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2238
Word association RELOADED

Rump
02-20-2017 09:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2239
Word association RELOADED

Dump
02-20-2017 10:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2240
Word association RELOADED

Chump
02-20-2017 10:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2241
Word association RELOADED

Champ
02-20-2017 12:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2242
Word association RELOADED

Hound
02-20-2017 12:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2243
Word association RELOADED

Dog.
02-20-2017 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2244
Word association RELOADED

Canine
02-20-2017 01:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2245
RE: Word association RELOADED

Incisor

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-20-2017 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2246
Word association RELOADED

Fang
02-20-2017 02:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2247
Word association RELOADED

Vampire.
02-21-2017 01:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DreamRebel Offline
Previously Lucky-Feet

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2015
Thanks: 444
Given 113 thank(s) in 77 post(s)
Post: #2248
Word association RELOADED

Jiangshi
02-21-2017 02:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The man Offline
Resistance Leader

Posts: 360
Joined: Feb 2017
Thanks: 2999
Given 104 thank(s) in 92 post(s)
Post: #2249
Word association RELOADED

Wut
02-21-2017 05:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
no Offline
True Scotsman

Posts: 1,238
Joined: Nov 2012
Thanks: 919
Given 474 thank(s) in 299 post(s)
Post: #2250
RE: Word association RELOADED

mate

Hello, traveler.

This is an ancient account I have not used in a long time. My views have changed much in the intervening months and years.

Nonetheless, I refuse to clean it up. Pretending that I've held my current views since the beginning of time is what we in the industry call a lie. Asking people to do so contributes to moralistic self-loathing. "See, those people have nothing damning! I do! I'm truly vile!"

Because you can never be a good person with a single blemish on the moral record, I thought that simply entertaining some thoughts made me irredeemable. Though I don't care for his writing style, William Faulkner presents a good counterexample. He went from being a typical Southern racist to supporting the civil rights movement. These days we'd yell at him for that, probably.

People are allowed to change their views.

Nevertheless, this period of my life has informed some of how I am today. In good ways and bad ways. To purge it would be to do a disservice to history. Perhaps it will not make anyone sympathetic, but it may help someone understand.

If, after reading all this, you still decide to use the post above as evidence that I am evil today, ask yourself if you have never disagreed with the moral code you now follow. In all likelihood you did, at some point. If some questions are verboten, and the answer is "how dare you ask that," don't expect your ideological opponents to ever change their minds.
02-21-2017 07:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Picture association Reptorian 45 7,580 05-24-2017 04:01 AM
Last Post: James Comey
  word association colbert2012 8,943 381,910 03-21-2016 09:01 PM
Last Post: Dead
  Post a word that rhymes with the previous word aaaaaaasd 28 4,803 09-28-2010 04:22 AM
Last Post: Prince Rilian

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | School Survival | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication